You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 2 Association of MetS, CAC score, and EAT measures with MACE risk in multivariable Cox regression

From: Metabolic syndrome, fatty liver, and artificial intelligence-based epicardial adipose tissue measures predict long-term risk of cardiac events: a prospective study

  HR 95% CI P value
Model 1
 MetS/diabetes status
  No MetS or diabetes 1.00 (Reference)
  MetS (no diabetes) 1.62 1.13–2.34 0.01
  Diabetes 1.78 1.11–2.84 0.02
 Age, years 1.07 1.05–1.08 < 0.001
 Male sex 1.83 1.37–2.44 < 0.001
 LDL cholesterol, mmol/L 1.02 1.01–1.03 0.01
Model 2: Model 1 + CAC score
 CAC scorea 1.28 1.22–1.33 < 0.001
 Mets/diabetes status
  No MetS or diabetes 1.00 (Reference)
  MetS (no diabetes) 1.58 1.10–2.27 0.01
  Diabetes 1.44 0.90–2.30 0.13
Model 3: Model 2 + EAT volumeb
 EAT volume, cm3a 1.52 1.23–1.89 < 0.001
 CAC score 1.28 1.23–1.33 < 0.001
Model 4: Model 2 + EAT attenuationb
 EAT attenuation, HU 0.95 0.93–0.98 < 0.001
 CAC score 1.27 1.21–1.32 < 0.001
  1. Final models based on backward stepwise selection of variables at a Wald p-value of 0.05
  2. Co-variates entered in Model 1: age, male sex, current smoker, past smoker, LDL cholesterol, statin use, anti-hypertensive treatment
  3. aHazard ratios are per 2-fold increase/doubling of EAT volume (cm3) and CAC score
  4. bMetS/diabetes status categories were not significantly associated with MACE risk
  5. CAC, coronary artery calcium; CAD, coronary artery disease; EAT, epicardial adipose tissue; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; MetS, metabolic syndrome